Cannabis Business Times' Best Cannabis Companies to Work For - 2027 Is Accepting Entries! Enter now.
Cannabis Business Times' Best Cannabis Companies to Work For - 2027 Is Accepting Entries! Enter now.
Virginia Lawmakers Respond to ‘Inaccurate Reports’ on Cannabis Sales Bill | Cannabis Business Times

Create a free Cannabis Business Times account to continue reading

Continue to Site »
Site will load in 15 seconds

Virginia Lawmakers Respond to ‘Inaccurate Reports’ on Cannabis Sales Bill

The lawmakers who drew up the state’s adult-use sales legislation that was incorporated into the state budget refuted claims about distribution and underage possession.

Va 187800437
Adobe Stock | Michael

Tony Lange2(smaller) Mug 2025 Headshot

No, the unlawful distribution of cannabis in Virginia did not accidentally become legal on July 1, 2026, nor did the possession of cannabis by those younger than 21 – at least according to two state lawmakers.

Del. Paul Krizek, D-Fairfax, and Sen. Lashrecse Aird, D-Henrico, refuted claims on July 9 that the adult-use cannabis sales legislation they sponsored – which was incorporated into the state budget – unintentionally left a one-year gap for certain provisions to take effect.

They issued a joint statement to respond to what they called “inaccurate reports and social media claims” that the budget language accidentally legalized underage possession and distribution from July 1, 2026, to July 1, 2027, calling those claims “unequivocally false.” They said that some of the sources of the “misinformation” came from individuals who never supported cannabis reform to begin with.

“Let me be absolutely clear: The budget language … did not legalize cannabis possession by minors, did not legalize the distribution of cannabis to minors and did not eliminate Virginia’s criminal penalties protecting young people,” Krizek said. “Virginia law continues to prohibit underage possession and unlawful distribution of cannabis. The enactment clauses included in the budget did not change those protections.”

The joint statement comes after Virginia State Police (VSP) Lt. Brandy Molinar sent an internal email suggesting that law enforcement’s hands are tied for the next year under the budget language, the Virginia Scope reported on July 7.

“As of July 1, 2026, there are no Code of Virginia violations related to marijuana,” Molinar wrote in the email, according to the Scope, which reported it obtained a copy of the email. The media outlet reported that Molinar directed VSP personnel to inform her of any cannabis-related enforcement actions they’ve taken since July 1.

However, Col. Jeffrey Katz, who serves as superintendent of VSP, issued a clarifying statement on July 8.

“VSP acknowledges that there have been rumors and questions pertaining to the agency’s posture on cannabis enforcement,” he said. “I would like to make it clear that the Virginia State Police will continue to enforce existing laws, in line with the Code of Virginia.”

While adult-use dispensaries are scheduled to open on July 1, 2027, under a licensed and regulatory framework established in the budget language, the confusion stemmed over effective dates of other provisions in the bill related to prohibited activities, such as distribution to minors.

Aird said she and Krizek centered their priorities on protecting young people, as well as ensuring public health and safety, throughout the process of sponsoring adult-use legislation.

“Unfortunately, misinformation spreads quickly, particularly when it involves complex legislation,” she said. “Virginians deserve an honest conversation about cannabis policy based on the facts and what the law actually says – not on inaccurate interpretation based on political opinion.”

Krizek and Aird originally sparred with Gov. Abigail Spanberger over the Democratic governor’s amendments that had included escalating criminal penalties for certain cannabis-related violations. When the General Assembly refused to take up her amendments earlier this year, Spanberger vetoed the bill in May.

But the pro-cannabis lawmakers and the governor negotiated a compromise for the adult-use sales bill to be included in the budget, removing Spanberger’s amendment for a Class 1 misdemeanor for underage possession while keeping penalties in place for those who distribute or sell cannabis to those underage.

Under the budget deal, the cannabis-related provisions also overhauled the state’s cannabis distribution regulations, repealing current laws and enacting new ones. The current controversy of “misinformation” is based on when the repeal language became/becomes effective compared to when the enactment language becomes effective – hence why some feared there was a one-year gap in policy.

Nate Green, the commonwealth’s attorney in James City County, suggested that the language in the budget bill was “ambiguous” because the repeal language included a July 1 date but not the year “2027,” The Virginian-Pilot reported on July 7.

That potential hiccup was discovered when the Virginia Association of Commonwealth’s Attorneys (VACA) was reviewing the language for its members last week. VACA includes 120 elected attorneys.

“It has at a minimum invited the argument that the old laws were repealed as of July 1, 2026,” Green told the Pilot. “They created a word problem, and word problems go against prosecutors. If it’s unclear, we lose. We only get to win when the words are clear.”

However, Green told Cannabis Business Times on July 9 that he no longer has a concern about the ambiguous date after the Virginia Code Commission cleared things up the previous day.

“I am extremely appreciative that yesterday the chair of Virginia’s Code Commission recognized that the original language was unclear and exercised the authority of the Code Commission to clarify this obvious error and removed any ambiguity or uncertainty,” Green said. “I now have confidence that the action taken by the Code Commission has addressed and eliminated any potential argument that the General Assembly intended to repeal the prohibitions against the underage possession or distribution of marijuana before the new laws become effective next July.”

Del. Marcus Simon, D-Fairfax, who chairs the Code Commission, acknowledged the effective date was unclear, Cardinal News reported July 9.

“The Division of Legislative Services recommended to the Code Commission that this was an obvious error, and so we used our authority to correct this,” Simon told the media outlet, calling the corrective action a “fairly routine thing.”

Following the earlier media reports, Del. Wren Williams, R-Patrick, criticized the potential hiccup by his colleagues on the other side of the aisle, even though Patrick voted in support of the adult-use sales bill that the Virginia House originally passed on Feb. 17.

“Democrats might have actually legalized marijuana through the budget process. Essentially the argument is that the Democrats did not enact the new laws until July 1 of 2027, leaving a one-year gap,” Williams said on social media July 8.

“There’s a lot of hubbub right now about who’s right and who’s wrong,” he said. “But now we know that Virginia State Police issued an immediate stop to their special agents from any kind of marijuana-related enforcement, essentially to stand down. Now, remember that the Virginia State Police are not county; they’re not city; they’re state. They answer to the executive, which is obviously led by Democrat Governor Abigail Spanberger. This is a chain of command.”

Williams’ remarks came just half an hour after Katz had issued the clarification statement on behalf of the VSP, and the delegate may not have seen that statement before making his own.

Aird and Krizek reinforced in Thursday’s joint statement that Virginia’s “longstanding prohibitions” on minors possessing cannabis and on unregulated cannabis distribution remain intact.

“The adult-use framework passed by the General Assembly includes strict age-verification requirements, product testing, child-resistant packaging, clear labeling, licensing requirements and robust enforcement tools to combat the illicit market,” Krizek said. “Those protections were deliberately designed to reduce youth access, protect consumers and provide strong oversight of our marketplace.”

Page 1 of 14
Next Page