Continue to Site »
Site will load in 15 seconds
Advertisment: Mary Gains Inc. » Mary Gains - Order 127 » CBT October ROS 970x250 Web Banner » Mary Gains 970-x-250.jpg

California Secretary of State Now Accepting Trademark Applications for Cannabis Products

The move follows California's Jan. 1 start date for its adult-use market.

California2

When adult-use marijuana became legal in California on Jan. 1, the California Secretary of State’s office followed the news by accepting trademark applications for cannabis products. As long as those products “are lawfully in commerce under California law,” according to Secretary of State Alex Padilla’s office, they may be eligible for registration.

It was an unexpected move in the largest legal cannabis market in the world. Marijuana remains illegal under federal law, and so the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) does not register cannabis products. States that oversee legal and regulated cannabis may allow trademark registration through their own trademark registries.  

Advertisment: Frank Mayer » Frank Mayer Order 84 » CBT ROS Medium Rectangle 300x250 October 2025 » Frank Mayer CBT Web Ad - July 2025.jpg

A key component of state trademark law is the matter of intrastate commerce. In this case, cannabis products are eligible for California trademark registration only if they are actively being sold within the state of California at the time of registration (and only if they comply with state law). An “intent-to-use” application, which exists at the federal level, will not be applicable for cannabis product trademark registrations in California.

Advertisment: Frank Mayer » Frank Mayer Order 84 » CBT ROS Medium Rectangle 300x250 October 2025 » Frank Mayer CBT Web Ad - July 2025.jpg

As Evoke Law explains: "In order to obtain protection you must: 1. Obtain a manufacturing or cultivating temporary license; and 2. Product must fully comply with MAUCRSA and the emergency regulations packaging and labeling requirements."

And even if a company obtains a registered trademark for a cannabis product, that will not impact any future applications with the USPTO. According to case law: “[T]he fact that the provision of a product or service may be lawful within a state is irrelevant to the question of federal registration when it is unlawful under federal law.”

Advertisment: Emerald Harvest » Emerald Harvest Order 115 » CBT ROS Leaderboard Ad 728x90 October 2025 » eh-360-web-banner-728x90

Top photo courtesy of Adobe Stock 

Advertisment: Frank Mayer » Frank Mayer Order 84 » CBT ROS Medium Rectangle 300x250 October 2025 » Frank Mayer CBT Web Ad - July 2025.jpg
Advertisment: Frank Mayer » Frank Mayer Order 84 » CBT ROS Medium Rectangle 300x250 October 2025 » Frank Mayer CBT Web Ad - July 2025.jpg
Page 1 of 184
Next Page
Advertisment: Fluence » Fluence Order 95 » CBT ROS Mobile Adhesion 360x120 October 2025 » FLU-DBA_PYTHN_360-x-120